00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

CapacitorCat just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Ai exceptions in the Portal

11,515 Views | 433 Replies
New Topic

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 16:57:43


At 10/26/25 11:26 AM, TecMysT wrote:Hello! (1st post)
Great topic, would like to contribute a little by gathering/including some informations in single post, some already surfaced here, some may still not be so obvious and planty I probably forgot but I've also provided links to sources that expands those subjects and adds other aspects. Disclaimer: I'll TRY stick to facts.

Lets start with LAION-5B dataset that should be used only for research puprpose yet was put in Stable Diffusion model, at this point it's confirmed those contain illegal materials, including but not limited to: child abuse, rape, executions, animal cruelty…
What needs to be remainded that when those datasets 'acquire' piece of data, it stays there forever.[1, 2] It's practicly impossible to erase information without deleting whoal dataset and no ammount of finetuning will help, even guardrails can be jailbreaked.[3] On top of that with preatty much all the internet scraped (dark web too) 24h/day, there will be a lot more of that and people already had to label those entries and be exposed to gruesome imagery that led to mental problems.[4]
Any adult content that use AI should be completely banned.(sorry not sorry)

The same people that were invested in NFT jumped to crypto and now, you guessed it, AI 'content'. It's like scammers already know what's the next cash grab.

They try to tell anyone that it's new medium similar to camera/photoshop and using crazy logical splits to convince world of their 'truths' even involving disabled people without their approval, just to get rich fast. I just link great video breaking down their mental gymnastics and also showing perspective from an actual disabled artist.[5]

AI images (never art since this term only applies to humans, not chimpanzees, not robots, and by calling it that way you just anthropomorphize computers, which is silly) are based on stolen digital property (money in banks are stored in digital form and still got value) without consent and compensation.
Also AI users are just larping as artists, most of the time they try to hide their AI usage, you know who else hides fake informaions from others? Exactly - scammers.

Want to include background in your work? (or any other thing) Commision artist! No money? Learn from many free tutorials! No time? Use free human made resources! But never, ever use AI slop, even if it's already generated, otherwise you not only showing how little your project means to you but also legitimizing plagiarism machine with your name. ('Why bother to interact with something when even creator doesn't give a shit.')

Same goes to tracing AI slop, overpainting, using as reference or whatever other thing you might think it can 'help' you with. You won't learn or prove anything except how little you care about environment and fellow humans.

One of the biggest and most repeated lies gaslighting artists from the begining: 'AI is just a tool'. It is not a tool in fact it's replacment or as The Showrunner AI admited - 'competitor'[6], simply put, if 'tool' can do something by itself and you have no real control over it, it's no longer a 'tool'.


Endgame for companies is to completely remove human factor and give away all the content creation to algorithms that pray on flawed human psychology to maintain enagment, basically it makes users stupid, even after ceasing to use chats.[7]

Tech bros say AI Agents will be next big thing toward AGI, fallacy since prompt injection can derail AI's 'work' process, it can't distinguish instruction from prompt.[8, 9, 10]

Amount of data to create anything reasembling real thing is staggering. Even biggest studios combined together + public domain, doesn't have enough data to train their own AI without relaying on all of the internet, otherwise they already would.

Not gonna talk about countless lawsuits/copyright claims since it's a broad subject, but for anyone with a pinch of empathy it's blatant theft and data laundering, if you're interested ->.[11]

At first AI in medicine improved finding cancer but new data revealed dark side: doctors who rely on it worsend their own skill in discovering cancerous cells.[12]

Programers felt that they are 20% more efficient with use of AI, yet studies show that in fact task on avarage took them 19% longer.[13]

Politics, yes the very thing no one is interested in but politics takes great interest in those people. AI contribute to rise of fascism just look at news.[14] For totalitarian government artists can be obstacle (with their empathy, remorse, values) but with machine there's no such conundrum, it can produce whatever piece of propaganda they want.[15]

Chats are resposible for Suicide[16], AI Psychosis[17] and 'Digital Necromancy'. (also not gonna dive into this difficult topics but check links or search for more info)

Erotic chatbots emerges… nah fuck that, decide for yourself.[18]

More people are disillusioned with all this AI crap, so trying to find safe haven for human creativity or just space that cultivates human conection, away from all the misinformations[19], deeptfakes, scams, see of slop and dystopian corporations aiming only at their profits by steeling our information, without a single fuck about person in front of the device. Meanwhile CEOs building bunkers with all that money, yeah sure, totally normal behavior when you're preaching how AGI is coming to save humanity and makes 'everyone' life better, totally not a gamble with human lifes...[20]

The more you know about this technology the less likely you want to interact with it.

So yes I wholeheartedly am against using any amount of AI. With few exception that doesn't undermine human labor or rely on stolen data and isn't used for profit, but for that they must be heavily regulated 1st.

Use Glaze/Nightshade despite it's an abuse toward AI companies^^[21]
Unfortunetly I'm not sure how it goes for voice/music but there was something at work.[22]

If you really want to deep dive into this topics, here are some people that years ago predicted and alarmed about all of this and still continue to do so:
Ed Zitron, Ed Newton-Rex, Neil Turkewitz, Reid Southen, Alex J. Champandard and every freaking artist out there that values integrity…

Stay sharp and don't let genAI dull your senses! (-;
I leave you with quote: "AI is the asbestos we are shoveling into the walls of our society and our descendants will be digging it out for generations."[23]

Thanks for reading!
TecMysT


Didnt realize you were new here. You speak like you’ve been here for years. Welcome. Enjoy your stay!


“This Website is my everything but I still go outside lol” - A Wise Man


If you don’t drink ocean water, you have nothing.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Twitter - Bluesky - YouTube - Website (work in progress) - Art Thread - Animation Thread

BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 17:12:56


At 10/27/25 04:00 PM, BrandyBuizel wrote:
Paula Wallace, founder and president of SCAD announced genAI courses last year and i clowned on her on linkedin where every criticism I wrote was swiftly deleted in her replies. Sorry, bud, it's real.


But.... why the fuck do you need special profession training for this? xD Wasn't the main marketing idea behind GenAI supposed to be that it requires no art school, takes no effort, it's fast, "anybody can generate an image", blah blah blah? Well, I guess, since you can monetize everything, you can monetize even something as silly as "courses on GenAI". What's next? Special courses on burglary? Schooling on how to professionally take a turd? Welcome to late-late-stage capitalism, everybody. :'(


BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 17:22:35


At 10/27/25 05:12 PM, Czyszy wrote:
At 10/27/25 04:00 PM, BrandyBuizel wrote:
Paula Wallace, founder and president of SCAD announced genAI courses last year and i clowned on her on linkedin where every criticism I wrote was swiftly deleted in her replies. Sorry, bud, it's real.

But.... why the fuck do you need special profession training for this? xD Wasn't the main marketing idea behind GenAI supposed to be that it requires no art school, takes no effort, it's fast, "anybody can generate an image", blah blah blah? Well, I guess, since you can monetize everything, you can monetize even something as silly as "courses on GenAI". What's next? Special courses on burglary? Schooling on how to professionally take a turd? Welcome to late-late-stage capitalism, everybody. :'(


I feel like a lot of the meat in those courses would concern ethics but I don't really know for certain.


I'm pretty certain my Ala Mater has started to allow for Gen Ai courses so I'm somewhat curious if anyone who is currently going there has some insight on it.


"I feel like a lot of the meat in those courses would concern ethics"


Honestly? I think that far too many pro-AI people need to be educated regarding ethics, so I'm kinda not 100% against such courses.


You know what the ideal GenAI course would be imo? Lesson 1: "Don't." 😂


BBS Signature

At 10/27/25 05:12 PM, Czyszy wrote:But.... why the fuck do you need special profession training for this? xD Wasn't the main marketing idea behind GenAI supposed to be that it requires no art school, takes no effort, it's fast, "anybody can generate an image", blah blah blah?


The main goal was always to take X away from people, then sell X back to people who've become wholly dependent on the infrastructure you control. Naturally, this involves undermining everything that could empower people to make something outside of your system.


BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 17:53:41


At 10/27/25 05:49 PM, kmau wrote:
At 10/27/25 05:12 PM, Czyszy wrote:But.... why the fuck do you need special profession training for this? xD Wasn't the main marketing idea behind GenAI supposed to be that it requires no art school, takes no effort, it's fast, "anybody can generate an image", blah blah blah?

The main goal was always to take X away from people, then sell X back to people who've become wholly dependent on the infrastructure you control. Naturally, this involves undermining everything that could empower people to make something outside of your system.


That's the industry in a nutshell pretty much.


BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 19:15:40


At 10/27/25 05:45 PM, Czyszy wrote:"I feel like a lot of the meat in those courses would concern ethics"

Honestly? I think that far too many pro-AI people need to be educated regarding ethics, so I'm kinda not 100% against such courses.

You know what the ideal GenAI course would be imo? Lesson 1: "Don't." 😂


ethics are not included in the course


At 10/27/25 04:34 PM, TecMysT wrote:So keep creating, solidarize with fellow artist of all mediums and screw AI, let the bots worry about slop! (o;


the only sentence that matters to me. frankly expounding on the topic almost legitimizes it just by being "worthy of debate"


i'm glad you agree due to whatever metric you studied to come to this conclusion. just gotta shut it down conceptually(genAI is toxic to NG)

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 19:20:00


At 10/27/25 07:15 PM, BrandyBuizel wrote:
At 10/27/25 05:45 PM, Czyszy wrote:"I feel like a lot of the meat in those courses would concern ethics"

Honestly? I think that far too many pro-AI people need to be educated regarding ethics, so I'm kinda not 100% against such courses.

You know what the ideal GenAI course would be imo? Lesson 1: "Don't." 😂

ethics are not included in the course


That's my best bet. ;D


BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 19:21:37


At 10/27/25 07:20 PM, Czyszy wrote:
At 10/27/25 07:15 PM, BrandyBuizel wrote:
At 10/27/25 05:45 PM, Czyszy wrote:"I feel like a lot of the meat in those courses would concern ethics"

Honestly? I think that far too many pro-AI people need to be educated regarding ethics, so I'm kinda not 100% against such courses.

You know what the ideal GenAI course would be imo? Lesson 1: "Don't." 😂

ethics are not included in the course

That's my best bet. ;D


well your best bet is wrong. i'm telling you now that ethics are not being taught in those courses. SCAD is an institutional embarrassment


Even though I'm honestly not very happy right now, I wanna try to understand why this is happening. Like if this site is struggling with money, I would be more than happy to lend my help in regards to marketing, and even lend my hand in music, sound-design, & voice acting to make something like this commercial.


And we could share this video in the meantime. Maybe even ask the original author to make it an ad on YouTube?


BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 19:30:46


At 10/27/25 07:26 PM, Jojo wrote:Even though I'm honestly not very happy right now, I wanna try to understand why this is happening. Like if this site is struggling with money, I would be more than happy to lend my help in regards to marketing, and even lend my hand in music, sound-design, & voice acting to make something like this commercial.

And we could share this video in the meantime. Maybe even ask the original author to make it an ad on YouTube?


This makes me cry. Newgrounds used to be user driven. What is Tom doing?


“This Website is my everything but I still go outside lol” - A Wise Man


If you don’t drink ocean water, you have nothing.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Twitter - Bluesky - YouTube - Website (work in progress) - Art Thread - Animation Thread

BBS Signature

At 10/27/25 07:26 PM, Jojo wrote:Even though I'm honestly not very happy right now, I wanna try to understand why this is happening. Like if this site is struggling with money, I would be more than happy to lend my help in regards to marketing, and even lend my hand in music, sound-design, & voice acting to make something like this commercial.

And we could share this video in the meantime. Maybe even ask the original author to make it an ad on YouTube?


  1. cool video
  2. newgrounds is a money pit, pretty much always has been losing money, famously
  3. @anamonator what the **** are you talking about, newgrounds IS user-driven, that hasn't changed

iu_1482145_5660743.webp


At 10/27/25 07:33 PM, BrandyBuizel wrote:
At 10/27/25 07:26 PM, Jojo wrote:Even though I'm honestly not very happy right now, I wanna try to understand why this is happening. Like if this site is struggling with money, I would be more than happy to lend my help in regards to marketing, and even lend my hand in music, sound-design, & voice acting to make something like this commercial.

And we could share this video in the meantime. Maybe even ask the original author to make it an ad on YouTube?


Yeah you’re right. It still is. But if Tom keeps loosening up on Ai guidelines, pretty soon Newgrounds will be swarming with people using Ai instead of collaborating with other people when they need help.


“This Website is my everything but I still go outside lol” - A Wise Man


If you don’t drink ocean water, you have nothing.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Twitter - Bluesky - YouTube - Website (work in progress) - Art Thread - Animation Thread

BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 19:40:10


At 10/27/25 07:33 PM, BrandyBuizel wrote:
At 10/27/25 07:26 PM, Jojo wrote:Even though I'm honestly not very happy right now, I wanna try to understand why this is happening. Like if this site is struggling with money, I would be more than happy to lend my help in regards to marketing, and even lend my hand in music, sound-design, & voice acting to make something like this commercial.

And we could share this video in the meantime. Maybe even ask the original author to make it an ad on YouTube?


I genuinely did not know about 2. If that's the case, @Tom, I would love to help in anyway I can in regards to marketing. I had no idea, otherwise I would've offered sooner.


BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 20:20:35


At 10/27/25 07:30 PM, Anamonator wrote:
At 10/27/25 07:26 PM, Jojo wrote:And we could share this video in the meantime. Maybe even ask the original author to make it an ad on YouTube?

This makes me cry. Newgrounds used to be user driven. What is Tom doing?


Let's not get melodramatic. This discussion has been going on for a while and probably gave staff some material to think about. Give them time to deliberate.


BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 20:57:53


I'll hold out a bit longer. Thank Leo Tolstoy.

iu_1482192_9692889.gif


BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-27 21:31:27


Keep the AI shit out of Newgrounds. This is a place built by artists for artists, not slop.


At 10/27/25 09:31 PM, TheSketchyArtist wrote:Keep the AI shit out of Newgrounds. This is a place built by artists for artists, not slop.


100% agree.


I understand that some aspects of technological advancement have their place alongside humans, but after seeing the stuff that has passed judgment, I am neither impressed nor inspired, just discouraged and disgusted. I feel we can do far better than this.


I also apologize for any moments where I have been a little too reactionary. I may be passionate, but I also wish to be precise. It's just... this site is one of the things on my small list of reasons to keep going; I would really prefer to not have to cross it off.


BBS Signature

At 10/27/25 05:12 PM, Czyszy wrote:
At 10/27/25 04:00 PM, BrandyBuizel wrote:
Paula Wallace, founder and president of SCAD announced genAI courses last year and i clowned on her on linkedin where every criticism I wrote was swiftly deleted in her replies. Sorry, bud, it's real.

But.... why the fuck do you need special profession training for this? xD Wasn't the main marketing idea behind GenAI supposed to be that it requires no art school, takes no effort, it's fast, "anybody can generate an image", blah blah blah? Well, I guess, since you can monetize everything, you can monetize even something as silly as "courses on GenAI". What's next? Special courses on burglary? Schooling on how to professionally take a turd? Welcome to late-late-stage capitalism, everybody. :'(


Paula Wallace might have been "bought out" by big tech. That could be one reason. Who cares about curriculum when you can just take someone's money and figure it out later.


At 10/27/25 08:20 PM, kmau wrote:
At 10/27/25 07:30 PM, Anamonator wrote:
At 10/27/25 07:26 PM, Jojo wrote:And we could share this video in the meantime. Maybe even ask the original author to make it an ad on YouTube?

This makes me cry. Newgrounds used to be user driven. What is Tom doing?

Let's not get melodramatic. This discussion has been going on for a while and probably gave staff some material to think about. Give them time to deliberate.


Essentially this.


I agree that allowing Ai is not the right path for Newgrounds in spite of my own views but if the thread has been allowed to go on for this long in spite of everything that has happened I doubt that Tom and the staff are just going to make a rash decision because between the content that is Ai assisted that's already on here vs. majority consensus amongst users not wanting Ai on Newgrounds there is a lot to talk about.


It's also why I've been reminding people not to push any arguments against Ai with anger, grandstand on the issue or be reactionary to anything because that could potentially have the opposite effect to what the majority would prefer because it runs the risk of making the people who are against Ai look performative and that would be a blow to those who are sincere in their veiws against Ai.


At 10/27/25 04:34 PM, TecMysT wrote:Lets clear/expand few of your concerns @Aalastein before I go any further.

ad 1. Alright, you are musician, you create a song and own it. Let's pretend for sake of argument that 'I wrote software which creates abstractions from your song and then produces something indistinguishable... and then claim that song as my own, you're not going to care that I technically didn't store your song as a file at a certain point....'

|

I already mentioned this in my last post. My issues with AI have always been about skill and effort, not theft/copyright infringement (those claims I'm always cautious about). If you use small bits as part of a larger majority-human-made production, this should not be worth cancelling over, even if the end result is kinda shit (in that case constructive criticism should apply). But full-on prompting is not your own work, you can agree on that?

|

The Audio Guidelines state "subtle use of AI is acceptable, for example if you are using AI-generated components as part of a larger original composition". Then later stating those components require disclosure. Maybe you should ask Julia Volkova, one of the members of the defunct Russian pop duo t.A.T.u, because @ADR3-N, an Audio mod and arguably one of the more helpful producers on this site, and excellent musician in her own right, used AI to alter her own voice to clone Volkova's.


Despite we already establish that data retency is a thing but it's easier to take the piracy path and that's why Disney and Universal suing Midjourney based on that premises.
Judge Orrick's statement encapsulates that nicely summarizing what is the underlying cause behind those systems - copyright infringement.

So far, most of the legal concerns, as well as Orrick's ruling, seem to refer to intellectual properties (correct if I'm wrong). Such as IPs, characters, recognizeable franchises (eg. Mickey Mouse, Mario, or Shrek), not necessarily ideas or actions, (eg. a tree, or drinking a coffee), in which this would be harder to have a case on. Cases involving real people like MLK or Robin Williams are usually done because of defamation, but are still otherwise just as much an issue as using copyrighted characters, that is, when they're used in bad faith, profit without compensation, or to defame.

|

OpenAI tries to block certain prompts to avoid these issues, to the point you can't even generate "italian plumber" without needing patchy workarounds. Midjourney has much fewer safeguards and is likely easier to abuse.


ad 2. Yes humanity is at fault but why companies that say they want to empower humans are doing something completely opposite.

|

Yep, that's corporate America for you. Big Tech just want their piece of the human exploitation pie and that battle goes beyond AI.


ad 3. If you want more proofs Reddit can help (reddit search bar in r/programming sub you can type there 'ai' bunch of topics will pop up with mostly negative indications and those with positive rated 0, comments inside explain why)

|

eeeh, don't tell @alsoknownas1 that.


Lets say that when you got mental problems you don't always (barely ever) think logically....
...Chatbots are designed to be 'free terapeuts' yet the hidden cost can be more than you excpect.

|

Yep. Critical thinking is important, always fact-check your sources, even if it's AI, even if it affirms your beliefs.


:...if you are aware that AI outscales any living human in speed, many times over. It should be clear that something isn't fair play in this race

|

There's a clear distinction between prompting (your typical GenAI that's relatively fast, but sloppy, hence why it's banned) and "hybrid" / AI assistance. (where a human does try to apply their own skills in conjunction with AI, and may require similar skills to No-AI). Don't conflate the two.


OK Lets get now to the thought experiment (yay!) with help of math (boo!).
-"What could happen if Tom and the Crew would let AI on this site"-

|

This thought experiment is both confusing and I suspect it's a strawman argument.

|

This debate is mainly about whether you should be able to use smaller exceptions of AI in an otherwise mostly human-made work (for example: backgrounds, voices, audio, upscaling, VFX, pre-production, or inspiration). Your experiment seems to be referring mainly to prompting, which is again, dissimilar to a no-AI or even a hybrid-AI workflow.

|

As stated at ad 1: Prompts =/= your own sloppy work, and NG's multiple Portal Guidelines seem to affirm that. Howver, your example involves Art, which follow a different set of guidelines with different, stricter restrictions.

iu_1482528_8157415.png

This means those 500 prompters would be banned on the spot!


I already said this in my last post and in other posts. a full-on AI ban with no exceptions (compared to just a ban on prompslop which NG already has) would benefit no one except the toxic subculture of die-hard AI-haters, giving them justification to grandstand and ostracise even the slightest hint of AI without criticism or nuance. You can't reason with people if you keep pushing them further away from you (thankfully all the die-hard "replace all artists" tech bros pretty much already have no reason to come here, so no need to worry about them).

|

I also think disclosure is a good way for mods to determine whether a hybrid has too much AI to be allowed or not. Granted, some of the permitted exceptions do seem lopsided, but that's what happens when you base your rules around a "majority".

|

This is something I want to address. The textbook definition of "majority" means 51% or more, which kinda seems too strict when the rules are trying to be subjective and applied at the mods' discretion.

Using terms like "vast majority" imply a whole more in use (eg. 80-90%) than just "majority", while "many" could mean a huge noticeable chunk, but not necessarily a majority or a minority. "Most" usually means it's more than just the halfway mark, while "some" is usually a bit less than half.

|

If trying to be subjective about allowing only "some" AI, wouldn't it be more appropriate if you instead said "many aspects were generated by AI" rather than "the majority was generated by AI" as the reason for removal? or "we want most of the work to be human-made". instead of.. "we want the majority to the work to.." you get the idea.


- Cara S, red lady who takes "Everything by Everyone" too literally.

- she/her (and they maybe)🏳️‍⚧️

- My voice sucks, twice as much as usual

BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-28 13:01:35


At 10/28/25 07:59 AM, DioShiba wrote:
At 10/27/25 08:20 PM, kmau wrote:
At 10/27/25 07:30 PM, Anamonator wrote:
At 10/27/25 07:26 PM, Jojo wrote:And we could share this video in the meantime. Maybe even ask the original author to make it an ad on YouTube?

This makes me cry. Newgrounds used to be user driven. What is Tom doing?

Let's not get melodramatic. This discussion has been going on for a while and probably gave staff some material to think about. Give them time to deliberate.

Essentially this.

I agree that allowing Ai is not the right path for Newgrounds in spite of my own views but if the thread has been allowed to go on for this long in spite of everything that has happened I doubt that Tom and the staff are just going to make a rash decision because between the content that is Ai assisted that's already on here vs. majority consensus amongst users not wanting Ai on Newgrounds there is a lot to talk about.

It's also why I've been reminding people not to push any arguments against Ai with anger, grandstand on the issue or be reactionary to anything because that could potentially have the opposite effect to what the majority would prefer because it runs the risk of making the people who are against Ai look performative and that would be a blow to those who are sincere in their veiws against Ai.


Simply put as possible, I feel at this point that any technological advancement that assists in one's creative process, but does not take away from the human expression aspect of the creation is fine. I personally, will always respect a person more that keeps their work as human as possible. I feel that anything that is neither ethically-sourced nor eco-friendly is a no-go for me, ESPECIALLY generative-ai. I understand that some animations here have used it ironically, but... is it really worth it at a certain point if it opens the floodgates to people that won't be using it ironically? I understand affordability and accessibility, but bear in mind too much convenience is the enemy of creativity. You'd be surprised what one can do with limitations. I made an entire movie with just my phone camera, a light, and Filmora. Even though I've been more of an ass than I thought upon reflection, I just wish the best for this site.


BBS Signature

At 10/28/25 01:01 PM, Jojo wrote:I understand that some animations here have used it ironically, but..

It would've been funnier if the artist simply chose to emulate the look of AI instead of outright using it. Something like this:



BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-28 16:18:36


At 10/28/25 05:17 AM, ChrisMckiernan wrote:
At 10/27/25 05:12 PM, Czyszy wrote:
At 10/27/25 04:00 PM, BrandyBuizel wrote:
Paula Wallace, founder and president of SCAD announced genAI courses last year and i clowned on her on linkedin where every criticism I wrote was swiftly deleted in her replies. Sorry, bud, it's real.

But.... why the fuck do you need special profession training for this? xD Wasn't the main marketing idea behind GenAI supposed to be that it requires no art school, takes no effort, it's fast, "anybody can generate an image", blah blah blah? Well, I guess, since you can monetize everything, you can monetize even something as silly as "courses on GenAI". What's next? Special courses on burglary? Schooling on how to professionally take a turd? Welcome to late-late-stage capitalism, everybody. :'(

Paula Wallace might have been "bought out" by big tech. That could be one reason. Who cares about curriculum when you can just take someone's money and figure it out later.


nah, she's always been a cunt actually since day one building her for-profit school

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-28 16:53:13


At 10/28/25 03:19 PM, kmau wrote:
At 10/28/25 01:01 PM, Jojo wrote:I understand that some animations here have used it ironically, but..
It would've been funnier if the artist simply chose to emulate the look of AI instead of outright using it. Something like this:

https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/568042


I prefer that approach as well. It's far more creative.


BBS Signature

OK @Aalastein let's forget about copyright. In that case you can argue that because work on AI started more than half century ago (1950s) with all the people and resources put in that technology to this day the effort and skills are on unfathomable level. Case closed, AI is always worthy. But wait it's not AI that is posting those work online for other humans to hit that like button and get dopamine hits, since it's not a sentient being it doesn't have needs, fears, life experiences and so on...

But why does it matter? Lets assume you've used 1 sec of sound produced by AI in 100 sec song. You may say that it's just 1% work that came from AI and 99% is human, so everything seems legit, right? Well here's the problem, single human doesn't have access to millions of sound, music, chords, voices at whim.

That's why we should look at the volume and how much compressed the knowledge is in that tiny 1 sec sound.

How do you even want to measure that kind of amount of data that AI have access to compared to any living or dead human? It is futile.


(About my silly thought experiment I did put disclaimer that it was mostly a joke but grounded on real user submissions based on data available through search bar of 4 portals.)


The thing with viral technologies is that without clear restrictions it start to seep, first slowly, through all the cracks in loose rules to finally flood the entire ecosystem. (We saw what happened with Facebook, at 1st you saw only what friends posted on their 'wall', after a while they introduce algorithms, at start not much happen, just from time to time you saw something from people that you never met, later when they improved algorithms, that knew how to capture your attention via interests, you barely saw anything from your friends anymore. Today? I don't know, heared only AI slop and chatbots trying to be your friends)

What I mean by that, this could be very similar case if even more 'AI assisted assets' would be allowed. So far you still can say what is made by AI but for how long? (Personally the use of ai in those 2 videos slipped me, so glad that I read this topic) What if use of AI become unrecognisable? Who's gonna check how much really AI was used? (not even AI have 100% certainty if something was made with AI)

All the bad actors that were just slowly seeping into portal with only 'some ai assisted' works now produced mostly AI assisted works, but now no one really can tell in fear of being accused of witch hunt.


I believe the perfect solution would be to make this platform AI free and any artist (of any and all mediums) that would have verified account here would be not only welcome but have something of a 'badge of honor', cause all the internet would know that the 'human only made' and site with 'Everything, By Everyone' goes hand in hand and is proud place to be for any creative soul.


OK small story. My friend this year, few times, send me links to some ai music on YT. (he's not active on any social media, complete normie or family man, you could say, the person that doesn't care about artist, yes even me^^ [or at least my work]). So every time in response I tried to explain him how's that a bad thing, that it takes attention from the real humans and their work, and by interacting with ai content you just increase counter for the algorithm to that stuff. Firstly I thought it all went into deaf ears, until yesterday!

He send me, you won't believe it, link to documentary about how technology influence humans, called "Digital Tsunami", threats and real stories about this invasive trend.

So remember you can make a difference. Cause AI no matter how tiny doesn't need your help, it got endless pit of money to be hyped. Artist on the other hand got only eachother.


I'm gonna end on that note and go with BrandyBuizel advice to not dig into this topic any further since' legitimizing it' wasn't my reason when I made very 1st post. Thanks!


Ask yourself if you stand for what you really believe or you let others dictate your beliefs.


Some other thoughts of mine:


I cannot speak from statistics like others here, but I can speak from the soul. As somebody who has never once used AI to aid in their music creation, I don't think people really understand how much they are truly capable of in terms of creativity just from their own intellect & imagination. And as somebody who has gone through the process of creating multiple times, the feeling just cannot be beat. It is the closest thing to magic I have ever felt. When you sacrifice that process for a prompt, you are separating yourself from such an important human experience. I genuinely believe most people underestimate what they are truly capable of, and I will prove it from this moment on. I will not explain my position any further, I will just be the example of it.


BBS Signature

Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-30 05:14:10


At 10/21/25 04:13 PM, DioShiba wrote:
At 10/21/25 04:08 PM, Czyszy wrote:Gooner is probably the single most petty and entitled slur I've heard in my fucking life tbh. xD Apparently there are groups who get triggered by other people's taste in erotic media. 😂

At least it sounds more pleasant than fapper


Response to Ai exceptions in the Portal 2025-10-30 05:16:05


At 10/30/25 05:14 AM, Grounder06 wrote:
At 10/21/25 04:13 PM, DioShiba wrote:
At 10/21/25 04:08 PM, Czyszy wrote:Gooner is probably the single most petty and entitled slur I've heard in my fucking life tbh. xD Apparently there are groups who get triggered by other people's taste in erotic media. 😂

At least it sounds more pleasant than fapper

The fact that you consider it a slur is pretty weird. I think there’s a difference between someone who likes erotic stuff to someone who’s constantly pleasuring themselves to it, which is what the slang is referring to. Though there are some people who will just call anyone that, there’s also a lot who know better.